<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>Cell Division - Latest articles</title>
		<link>http://www.celldiv.com</link>
		<description>The latest articles from Cell Division (ISSN 1747-1028) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/14"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/13"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/12"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/11"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/10"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/9"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/8"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/7"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/6"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/5"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>  
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/14">
            
            <title>Anti cancer effects of curcumin: Cycle of life and death
</title>
			<description>Increasing knowledge on the cell cycle deregulations in cancers has promoted the introduction of phytochemicals, which can either modulate signaling pathways leading to cell cycle regulation or directly alter cell cycle regulatory molecules, in cancer therapy. Most human malignancies are driven by chromosomal translocations or other genetic alterations that directly affect the function of critical cell cycle proteins such as cyclins as well as tumor suppressors, e.g., p53. In this respect, cell cycle regulation and its modulation by curcumin are gaining widespread attention in recent years. Extensive research has addressed the chemotherapeutic potential of curcumin (diferuloylmethane), a relatively non-toxic plant derived polyphenol. The mechanisms implicated are diverse and appear to involve a combination of cell signaling pathways at multiple levels. In the present review we discuss how alterations in the cell cycle control contribute to the malignant transformation and provide an overview of how curcumin targets cell cycle regulatory molecules to assert anti-proliferative and/or apoptotic effects in cancer cells. The purpose of the current article is to present an appraisal of the current level of knowledge regarding the potential of curcumin as an agent for the chemoprevention of cancer via an understanding of its mechanism of action at the level of cell cycle regulation. Taken together, this review seeks to summarize the unique properties of curcumin that may be exploited for successful clinical cancer prevention.</description>
			<link>http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/14</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Gaurisankar Sa and Tanya Das</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Cell Division 2008, 3:14</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-10-03</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-1028-3-14</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Cell Division</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1747-1028</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-03</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/13">
            
            <title>Rb and hematopoiesis: stem cells to anemia</title>
			<description>The retinoblastoma protein, Rb, was one of the first tumor suppressor genes identified as a result of the familial syndrome retinoblastoma. In the period since its identification and cloning a large number of studies have described its role in various cellular processes. The application of conditional somatic mutation with lineage and temporally controlled gene deletion strategies, thus circumventing the lethality associated with germ-line deletion of Rb, have allowed for a reanalysis of the in vivo role of Rb. In the hematopoietic system, such approaches have led to new insights into stem cell biology and the role of the microenvironment in regulating hematopoietic stem cell fate. They have also clarified the role that Rb plays during erythropoiesis and defined a novel mechanism linking mitochondrial function to terminal cell cycle withdrawal. These studies have shed light on the in vivo role of Rb in the regulation of hematopoiesis and also prompt further analysis of the role that Rb plays in both the regulation of hematopoietic stem cells and the terminal differentiation of their progeny.</description>
			<link>http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/13</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Carl R Walkley, Vijay G Sankaran and Stuart H Orkin</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Cell Division 2008, 3:13</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-09-08</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-1028-3-13</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Cell Division</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1747-1028</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-08</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/12">
            
            <title>Speeding through cell cycle roadblocks: Nuclear cyclin D1-dependent kinase and neoplastic transformation</title>
			<description>Mitogenic induction of cyclin D1, the allosteric regulator of CDK4/6, is a key regulatory event contributing to G1 phase progression. Following the G1/S transition, cyclin D1 activation is antagonized by GSK3&#946;-dependent threonine-286 (Thr-286) phosphorylation, triggering nuclear export and subsequent cytoplasmic degradation mediated by the SCFFbx4-&#945;Bcrystallin E3 ubiquitin ligase. Although cyclin D1 overexpression occurs in numerous malignancies, overexpression of cyclin D1 alone is insufficient to drive transformation. In contrast, cyclin D1 mutants refractory to phosphorylation-dependent nuclear export and degradation are acutely transforming. This raises the question of whether overexpression of cyclin D1 is a significant contributor to tumorigenesis or an effect of neoplastic transformation. Significantly, recent work strongly supports a model wherein nuclear accumulation of cyclin D1-dependent kinase during S-phase is a critical event with regard to transformation. The identification of mutations within SCFFbx4-&#945;Bcrystallin ligase in primary tumors provides mechanistic insight into cyclin D1 accumulation in human cancer. Furthermore, analysis of mouse models expressing cyclin D1 mutants refractory to degradation indicate that nuclear cyclin D1/CDK4 kinase triggers DNA re-replication and genomic instability. Collectively, these new findings provide a mechanism whereby aberrations in post-translational regulation of cyclin D1 establish a cellular environment conducive to mutations that favor neoplastic growth.</description>
			<link>http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/12</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Laura L Pontano and J Alan Diehl</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Cell Division 2008, 3:12</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-09-02</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-1028-3-12</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Cell Division</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1747-1028</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-02</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/11">
            
            <title>The emerging regulatory potential of SCFMet30 -mediated polyubiquitination and proteolysis of the Met4 transcriptional activator</title>
			<description>The yeast SCFMet30 ubiquitin ligase plays a critical role in cell division by regulating the Met4 transcriptional activator of genes that control the uptake and assimilation of sulfur into methionine and S-adenosyl-methionine. The initial view on how SCFMet30 performs its function has been driven by the assumption that SCFMet30 acts exclusively as Met4 inhibitor when high levels of methionine drive an accumulation of cysteine. We revisit this model in light of the growing evidence that SCFMet30 can also activate Met4. The notion that Met4 can be inhibited or activated depending on the sulfur metabolite context is not new, but for the first time both aspects have been linked to SCFMet30, creating an interesting regulatory paradigm in which polyubiquitination and proteolysis of a single transcriptional activator can play different roles depending on context. We discuss the emerging molecular basis and the implications of this new regulatory phenomenon.</description>
			<link>http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/11</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Srikripa Chandrasekaran and Dorota Skowyra</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Cell Division 2008, 3:11</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-07-25</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-1028-3-11</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Cell Division</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1747-1028</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-25</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/10">
            
            <title>The chromosomal passenger complex and the spindle assembly checkpoint: kinetochore-microtubule error correction and beyond</title>
			<description>During mitosis, correct bipolar chromosome attachment to the mitotic spindle is an essential prerequisite for the equal segregation of chromosomes. The spindle assembly checkpoint can prevent chromosome segregation as long as not all chromosome pairs have obtained bipolar attachment to the spindle. The chromosomal passenger complex plays a crucial role during chromosome alignment by correcting faulty chromosome-spindle interactions (e.g. attachments that do not generate tension). In the process of doing so, the chromosomal passenger complex generates unattached chromosomes, a specific situation that is known to promote checkpoint activity. However, several studies have implicated an additional, more direct role for the chromosomal passenger complex in enforcing the mitotic arrest imposed by the spindle assembly checkpoint. In this review, we discuss the different roles played by the chromosomal passenger complex in ensuring proper mitotic checkpoint function. Additionally, we discuss the possibility that besides monitoring the presence of unattached kinetochores, the spindle assembly checkpoint may also be capable of responding to chromosome-microtubule interactions that do not generate tension and we propose experimental set-ups to study this.</description>
			<link>http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/10</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Gerben Vader, Andr&#233; F Maia and Susanne MA Lens</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Cell Division 2008, 3:10</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-28</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-1028-3-10</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Cell Division</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1747-1028</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/9">
            
            <title>Insights from mouse models into human retinoblastoma</title>
			<description>Novel murine models of retinoblastoma based on Rb gene deletion in concert with inactivation of Rb family members have recently been developed. These new Rb knockout models of retinoblastoma provide excellent tools for pre-clinical studies and for the exploration of the genetics of tumorigenesis driven by RB inactivation. This review focuses on the developmental consequences of Rb deletion in the retina and the genetic interactions between Rb and the two other members of the pocket protein family, p107 (Rbl1) and p130 (Rbl2). There is increasing appreciation that homozygous RB mutations are insufficient for human retinoblastoma. Identifying and understanding secondary gene alterations that cooperate with RB inactivation in tumorigenesis may be facilitated by mouse models. Recent investigation of the p53 pathway in retinoblastoma, and evidence of spatial topology to early murine retinoblastoma are also discussed in this review.</description>
			<link>http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/9</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>David MacPherson</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Cell Division 2008, 3:9</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-19</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-1028-3-9</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Cell Division</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1747-1028</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/8">
            
            <title>The many faces of ubiquitinated histone H2A: insights from the DUBs</title>
			<description>Monoubiquitination of H2A is a major histone modification in mammalian cells. Understanding how monoubiquitinated H2A (uH2A) regulates DNA-based processes in the context of chromatin is a challenging question. Work in the past years linked uH2A to transcriptional repression by the Polycomb group proteins of developmental regulators. Recently, a number of mammalian deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) that catalyze the removal of ubiquitin from H2A have been discovered. These studies provide convincing evidence that H2A deubiquitination is connected with gene activation. In addition, uH2A regulatory enzymes have crucial roles in the cellular response to DNA damage and in cell cycle progression. In this review we will discuss new insights into uH2A biology, with emphasis on the H2A DUBs.</description>
			<link>http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/8</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Joseph HA Vissers, Francesco Nicassio, Maarten van Lohuizen, Pier Paolo Di Fiore and Elisabetta Citterio</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Cell Division 2008, 3:8</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-1028-3-8</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Cell Division</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1747-1028</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/7">
            
            <title>Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases: global regulation and activation cycles</title>
			<description>Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases (CRLs) comprise the largest known category of ubiquitin ligases. CRLs regulate an extensive number of dynamic cellular processes, including multiple aspects of the cell cycle, transcription, signal transduction, and development. CRLs are multisubunit complexes composed of a cullin, RING H2 finger protein, a variable substrate-recognition subunit (SRS), and for most CRLs, an adaptor that links the SRS to the complex. Eukaryotic species contain multiple cullins, with five major types in metazoa. Each cullin forms a distinct class of CRL complex, with distinct adaptors and/or substrate-recognition subunits. Despite this diversity, each of the classes of CRL complexes is subject to similar regulatory mechanisms. This review focuses on the global regulation of CRL complexes, encompassing: neddylation, deneddylation by the COP9 Signalosome (CSN), inhibitory binding by CAND1, and the dimerization of CRL complexes. We also address the role of cycles of activation and inactivation in regulating CRL activity and switching between substrate-recognition subunits.</description>
			<link>http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/7</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Dimple R Bosu and Edward T Kipreos</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Cell Division 2008, 3:7</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-02-18</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-1028-3-7</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Cell Division</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1747-1028</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/6">
            
            <title>Genetic analysis of the spindle checkpoint genes san-1, mdf-2, bub-3 and the CENP-F homologues hcp-1 and hcp-2 in Caenorhabditis elegans</title>
			<description>Background:
The spindle checkpoint delays the onset of anaphase until all sister chromatids are aligned properly at the metaphase plate. To investigate the role san-1, the MAD3 homologue, has in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos we used RNA interference (RNAi) to identify genes synthetic lethal with the viable san-1(ok1580) deletion mutant.
Results:
The san-1(ok1580) animal has low penetrating phenotypes including an increased incidence of males, larvae arrest, slow growth, protruding vulva, and defects in vulva morphogenesis. We found that the viability of san-1(ok1580) embryos is significantly reduced when HCP-1 (CENP-F homologue), MDF-1 (MAD-1 homologue), MDF-2 (MAD-2 homologue) or BUB-3 (predicted BUB-3 homologue) are reduced by RNAi. Interestingly, the viability of san-1(ok1580) embryos is not significantly reduced when the paralog of HCP-1, HCP-2, is reduced. The phenotype of san-1(ok1580);hcp-1(RNAi) embryos includes embryonic and larval lethality, abnormal organ development, and an increase in abnormal chromosome segregation (aberrant mitotic nuclei, anaphase bridging). Several of the san-1(ok1580);hcp-1(RNAi) animals displayed abnormal kinetochore (detected by MPM-2) and microtubule structure. The survival of mdf-2(RNAi);hcp-1(RNAi) embryos but not bub-3(RNAi);hcp-1(RNAi) embryos was also compromised. Finally, we found that san-1(ok1580) and bub-3(RNAi), but not hcp-1(RNAi) embryos, were sensitive to anoxia, suggesting that like SAN-1, BUB-3 has a functional role as a spindle checkpoint protein.
Conclusion:
Together, these data suggest that in the C. elegans embryo, HCP-1 interacts with a subset of the spindle checkpoint pathway. Furthermore, the fact that san-1(ok1580);hcp-1(RNAi) animals had a severe viability defect whereas in the san-1(ok1580);hcp-2(RNAi) and san-1(ok1580);hcp-2(ok1757) animals the viability defect was not as severe suggesting that hcp-1 and hcp-2 are not completely redundant.</description>
			<link>http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/6</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Vinita A Hajeri, Anil M Stewart, Landon L Moore and Pamela A Padilla</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Cell Division 2008, 3:6</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-02-04</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-1028-3-6</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Cell Division</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1747-1028</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/5">
            
            <title>Emerging roles of the SUMO pathway in mitosis</title>
			<description>SUMO proteins are small ubiquitin-like modifiers found in all eukaryotes that become covalently conjugated to other cellular proteins. The SUMO conjugation pathway is biochemically similar to ubiquitin conjugation, although the enzymes within the pathway act exclusively on SUMO proteins. This post-translational modification controls many processes. Here, I will focus on evidence that SUMOylation plays a critical role(s) in mitosis: Early studies showed a genetic requirement for SUMO pathway components in the process of cell division, while later findings implicated SUMOylation in the control of mitotic chromosome structure, cell cycle progression, kinetochore function and cytokinesis. Recent insights into the targets of SUMOylation are likely to be extremely helpful in understanding each of these aspects. Finally, growing evidence suggests that SUMOylation is a downstream target of regulation through Ran, a small GTPase with important functions in both interphase nuclear trafficking and mitotic spindle assembly.</description>
			<link>http://www.celldiv.com/content/3/1/5</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Mary Dasso</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Cell Division 2008, 3:5</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-01-24</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1747-1028-3-5</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Cell Division</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1747-1028</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-24</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
    <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
